[2026 Update] Are Prop Firms Shady? Reasons Why They’re Called “Don’t Do It” and the Truth

未分類
未分類
当サイト「プロップファーム解体新書」は、海外居住者向けにプロップファーム(主にFintokei)の情報提供を目的として運営しています。日本在住の方に向けた勧誘を目的としてはいません。
この記事を書いた人
かいたい先生
Shinjo-kun
Shinjo-kun
“Aren’t prop firms shady?” “Some people say ‘don’t do it,’ but what’s the reality?”

If you’ve been doing overseas FX trading, you may have had this question at some point.

💭 “There are also rumors that you can’t withdraw…” “I heard that over 50 companies have gone bankrupt…” “But being able to trade with a large capital without self-funds is appealing…”

I myself operate a YouTube channel called “Prop Firm Dissection” and have implemented over 30 giveaway campaigns, as well as participated in Expo 2025 Dubai, where I’ve seen both the front and back of the prop firm industry.

To put it bluntly, the prop firm industry has a stark contrast between “shady operators” and “reliable operators.” That’s why, if you have the right knowledge, prop firms can be a powerful alternative to overseas FX.

📌 Conclusion of this article (3-minute summary)

  • The truth behind “prop firms are shady” → It’s true that over 50 companies disappeared during the industry shakeout period. However, the remaining operators have improved in reliability.
  • The real meaning behind “don’t do prop firms” → There is risk if you choose the wrong operator. Conversely, there’s no problem if you choose correctly.
  • Reason to start prop firms now → In 2026, overseas FX deposits and withdrawals will become difficult due to regulatory changes. Prop firms are less affected by this.
  • Recommended way to start → First, try the free trial of Fintokei.

📖 What you’ll learn in this article

  1. 6 reasons why “prop firms are shady”
  2. Fact-based rebuttals to those reasons
  3. How to distinguish between reliable and avoidable operators
  4. Reasons why prop firms will be more advantageous than overseas FX in 2026
  5. Frequently asked questions (FAQ)
  6. How to try it for free right away

Shinjo-kun
Shinjo-kun
Professor Kaitai! When I search for prop firms online, it says “shady” and “don’t do it” – is it really okay?
Professor Kaitai
Professor Kaitai
That’s a good question. There are reasons why they are called “shady.” But if you understand those reasons correctly, you can actually identify “not-shady operators.” Let’s take a look together.

6 Reasons Why “Prop Firms Are Shady”

First, let’s organize the reasons why prop firms are called “shady” and “don’t do it.”

Recently, @manbou_sousai, known for providing information on overseas FX, posted on X about the “Reasons why major overseas FX brokers don’t enter the prop firm business,” which became a hot topic.

🔍 6 Reasons Why They’re Called “Shady”

  1. The business model is the opposite of overseas FX (exam fee business)
  2. The structure is such that the operator loses money when users win
  3. There are many withdrawal issues and backlash incidents
  4. Lack of regulatory framework
  5. Major overseas FX firms don’t enter the market
  6. Over 50 companies disappeared between 2023 and 2025

These claims are factual to some extent. That’s why voices saying “shady” also make sense.

However, if you dig deeper into each reason, the conclusion is not “they’re all bad,” but rather “that’s why operator selection is important.”

Thoroughly Examining the 6 “Shady Reasons”

Reason 1 “The business model is the opposite” → That’s why they can coexist

What’s being said: Prop firms’ revenue source is exam/retry fees, while overseas FX is from spread revenue. They’re fundamentally different.

The facts: It’s true that they’re different. But that’s why they’re in a “complementary relationship” rather than “competing.”

  • Overseas FX → For those who want to trade with high leverage using their own funds
  • Prop Firms → For those with skills but no funds, or who want to limit risk

Just because a ramen shop doesn’t serve curry doesn’t mean curry has no value. There are players with different strengths in each market.

Professor Kaitai
Professor Kaitai
“Major firms don’t enter = no value” may be an oversimplification. Rather, it’s because the specialized prop firms like FTMO and Fintokei were able to grow rapidly in this niche that the major brokers haven’t touched.

Reason 2 “Users winning means operator loses” → Overseas FX has the same structure

What’s being said: Prop firms have to pay profits to successful challengers, so they lose money when users win.

The facts: This is fundamentally the same as the “B-Book” structure of overseas FX brokers.

Many overseas FX brokers use the “B-Book” model, where they take the client’s orders internally instead of routing them to the market. This is a structure where “the operator profits if the client loses,” which is the same issue of conflict of interest as prop firms.

In fact, prop firms generally have a 5-20% challenge pass rate, and they build their business on challenge fee revenue.

Reason 3 “Withdrawal issues and backlash are common” → The difference between operators is huge

What’s being said: Can’t withdraw, poor support, sudden service termination, etc.

The facts: Unfortunately, there are unscrupulous operators that exist. That’s why “operator selection” is so important.

On the other hand, reputable veteran operators are completely different.

✅ Track Record of Reliable Prop Firms

  • FTMO: Established in 2015, #1 on Deloitte Fast 50 for 2 consecutive years, featured in Forbes, over $170 million in total payouts
  • Fintokei: Entered the Japanese market in January 2023, numerous withdrawal reports on social media, excellent Japanese support
  • SuperFunded: Established in 2021, partnered with Eightcap (ASIC regulated), 24/7 Japanese support
  • Fundora: Pre-launched in January 2025, Japan-based, confirmed with the Financial Services Agency
Shinjo-kun
Shinjo-kun
FTMO is listed on Deloitte and Forbes? It’s definitely not shady at all!
Professor Kaitai
Professor Kaitai
That’s right. The fact that “there are shady operators” is very different from “the entire industry is shady.” If you choose a reliable operator, you can use it with peace of mind.

【Comparison Table】 Reliable Prop Firms vs. Operators to Avoid

So, which operators should you choose? Please refer to the comparison table below.

✅ 2025 Recommended Prop Firm Comparison

Firm Name Established Withdrawal Record Japanese Support Max Capital Reliability Rating
FTMO 2015 ◎ Over $170 million+ △ English-centric $400,000 ★★★★★
FundedNext 2022 ◎ Numerous △ Partly supported $300,000 ★★★★☆

※Ratings are based on information as of November 2025. Please check the latest information on each official website.

❌ Characteristics of Prop Firms to Avoid

On the other hand, operators with the following characteristics are best to avoid.

🚨 These operators are risky!

  • Less than 1 year since establishment with unclear withdrawal records → Operational stability cannot be verified
  • No withdrawal reports found on social media → Unclear if withdrawals are actually possible
  • Absolutely no Japanese support → Difficult to handle troubles
  • Opaque information about the operating company → Location and representative unclear
  • Constantly touting abnormally high profit sharing rates (95%+) → Sustainability questionable
  • Challenge fees extremely low (less than half of the market rate) → Revenue model unclear